Further Discussion....Last Week!!! Post 3

I feel most concepts in the book were gone through quite extensively. I feel as though if anything maybe the chapter on public communication could’ve been longer in that public communication is such a big part of life and communicating in a public sphere is very important for many jobs. I think the chapter could have been more elaborate when it was talking about types of arguments. I feel the authoritative and motivational arguments and substantive arguments had so much within each of those sections that it could have been broadened. I think this is especially true when talking about fallacies because that didn’t really go into depth and just talked about post hoc fallacy when in reality there are many more fallacies.